Would the TOGAF User Group be able to open up the standard?
The idea of looking into other Enterprise Architecture frameworks is right but it would hardly materialise in a TOGAF User Group
Aggregated enterprise architecture wisdom
The idea of looking into other Enterprise Architecture frameworks is right but it would hardly materialise in a TOGAF User Group
continuing
The PM is as such the administrative secretary of a project team who has to facilitate the work of the professionals rather than tell them what to do and how they should break down the work. Hence, while the Project Manager has own role in a…
…without an EA, a transformation is blind. It does not see the objects around and in its path. Thus it bumps into them or it fails to consider them.
A manager must make sure that the team members are motivated, otherwise, expressing interest in the team personal well being may be seen only as political correctness.
Since we don’t know what we don’t know about EA, the first step would be to get to know what we don’t know. Only then we can the right questions.
Given the EA state today, an EA architect should first create and employ own methodology to model the integrated blueprint of the enterprise and guide the transformation.
Too often the “Enterprise” in the EA term translates into experience in the enterprise IT, while “Architect” into a senior IT employee.
The big issue is though that we don’t know what we don’t know. Hence we don’t know what to do about it.
Such IT failures we learn nothing from, have a debilitating effect on future projects. Organizations are paralysed by the fear of change. Hence things continue to be bad for fear they can get even worse.
Failing to appraise the situation properly is perhaps the main cause of failure for IT projects.
Failing to appraise the situation properly is perhaps the main cause of failure for IT projects.