Architecture Frameworks – too complex and multi-dimensional?

Following the recent The Open Group’s “Business Transformation in Finance, Government & Healthcare” conference in London, I was pleased to see this comment about Lean Enterprise Architecture: “We were told that Standard Frameworks are too complex and multidimensional – people were interested in how we use them to provide simple working guidelines to the architecture…

Related posts:

  1. Multiple Integrated Architecture Frameworks (MIAF) Increasingly I’m hearing architects talking about their frustration with the…
  2. Zachman Ontology, not Framework? Time to rename it?There is an interesting discussion on the…
  3. TOGAF Poster 17 – The Architecture Repository The Architecture Repository is where architects store work outputs. This…

Zachman Ontology, not Framework?

Time to rename it?There is an interesting discussion on the Zachman Framework LinkedIn group, about the practical use and tool support for the Zachman Framework. I’ve put up a couple of comments because the Zachman Framework is not a good basis for a practical EA use or tool support, and it is about time that…

Related posts:

  1. The Gill Framework: Do We Need Another EA Framework? We already have too many predefined frameworks for enterprise architecture,…
  2. Zachman Version 3.0 John Zachman recently announced a new version of his framework….
  3. Architecture Frameworks – too complex and multi-dimensional? Following the recent The Open Group’s “Business Transformation in Finance,…