4th Nordic EA Summer School

Really looking forward to this! Join us! The 4th Nordic EA Summer School (12.-16.8.2013) is for researchers, practitioners, industry experts and executives, development managers, and students as well as others interested in the field of enterprise architecture, who want to spend a week together and share and learn more about EA with more 100 experts and […]

Having Standards and Going Broke

One of my favorite surveys I use when talking to a large audience, is to have the house lights brought up and then ask, “Would everyone here who personally thinks that they are irresponsible and unreasonable, please raise your hand.” It always ge…

EA Roadmap for success: Consultants

<p><span style=”color: #505050; font-size: 11px; line-height: 19px;”>In this 9th posting we will cover the topic of using consultants in your Enterprise Architecture practice. This may seem like a strange topic to address. After all, we do offer consultancy, so </span><em style=”color: #505050; font-size: 11px; line-height: 19px;”>of course</em><span style=”color: #505050; font-size: 11px; line-height: 19px;”> we can help. That’s our job. There is more to be said about this topic, though, especially in the context of enterprise architecture.</span></p><p></p><div class=”captionImage left” style=”width: 600px;”><img class=”left” src=”http://www.bizzdesign.com/assets/BlogDocuments-2/_resampled/resizedimage600375-Roadmap-for-success-Consultancy.png” alt=”Part 9. Consultancy” title=”Roadmap for succes part 9: consultancy” width=”600″ height=”375″/><p class=”caption”>Consultancy for Enterprise Architecture</p></div><h2>What Enterprise Architecture is all about</h2><p>In our view, enterprise architecture is all about answering the question: how do we want to organize ourselves? It is a conceptual tool that helps you to get from where you are, to where you want to be. As a discipline, we frequently make use of <em>models</em> that describe – with respect to a set of concerns from a stakeholder – where we are, and/or where we want to go.</p><p>All of this requires an organization to answer some tough questions: who are we? Who do we want to be?</p><p></p><div class=”captionImage left” style=”width: 400px;”><img class=”left” src=”http://www.bizzdesign.com/assets/BlogDocuments-2/Consultancy-face-the-reality.png” alt=”Facing reallity ” title=”Consultancy is facing reality” width=”400″ height=”364″/><p class=”caption”>Facing reality</p></div><p>As most of us know, looking in the mirror can be really hard. It is tempting to only see the good things. Not only that, there’s more that must be taken into account. For example: the principle of bounded rationality (Simon) comes into play when taking into account that we just cannot know everything and thus outside help may be needed. The same goes for group-think: it is a well-known fact that in many organizations the desire for harmony overrides the realistic view of a situation leading to a very slanted perspective of the real world. This typically tends to hamper decision making. Again, consultants may help by providing a fresh pair of eyes.</p><h2>New developments in the market</h2><p>Enterprise Architecture is a relatively young (management) discipline, and we see a lot of development in the field still. It sometimes seems that new (versions of) frameworks and approaches are published every week. A new trend, though, is the publication of case studies, filled with best practices, suggestions for aligning with other frameworks (data management, risk management, security, strategic management, project management and so on).</p><p>Staying up to speed with development in the field is hard and requires time. In our experience: consultants are often asked because of their extensive experience with frameworks and approaches, and therefore have more incentive to stay up to speed.</p><h2>Level of involvement</h2><p>Whether you are requesting help from consultants to avoid / break through the limits of bounded rationality or group think, or because you need specific expertise not available in your organization: stop to think about the level of involvement that you need.</p><p>One thing seems obvious: since architecture touches upon the essence of your organization it makes sense to avoid a situation where consultants are <em>responsible</em> and <em>accountable</em> for your architecture, unless you really know what you’re doing.</p><p>In general, consultants should do what their name says: consult. Give advice. Train. Tutor. Coach. Ultimately, the organization hiring the consultant should remain in charge of their own destiny, after all!</p><h2>Next posting</h2><p>If you’d like to know more, please contact the authors directly at <a title=”E-mail Bas van Gils” href=”mailto:b.vangils@bizzdesign.com”>b.vangils@bizzdesign.com</a> / <a title=”E-mail Sven van Dijk” href=”mailto:s.vandijk@bizzdesign.com”>s.vandijk@bizzdesign.com</a>, or leave a comment. The next post in this series is about using architecture principles and models. It is scheduled to be posted in between 25<sup>th</sup> and the 29<sup>th</sup> of march. </p>

Categories Uncategorized

Three signs that your project has a good IT architect

Three signs: Clarity, Creativity, Simplicity(photo credit: blinkingidiot)When one is working on a IT project, how does one tell if one’s team has a good IT architect?  Good architects should produce good architectures, and through them, good archi…

Categories Uncategorized

Business Architecture Tweet Jam – March 19

Today, Business Architecture is shaping and fostering enterprise transformation initiatives and continuous improvement throughout companies of all sizes. On Tuesday, March 19, The Open Group will host a tweet jam examining the topic of Business Architecture. … Continue reading

www.forbes.com: outside-in & competitiveness

“.. Harvard Business School professor Ranjay Gulati writes:

Those companies built around an inside-out mind-set—those pushing out products and services to the marketplace based on a narrow viewpoint of their customers that looks at them only through the narrow lens of their products—are less resilient in turbulent times than those organized around an outside-in mind-set that starts with the marketplace, then looks to deliver creatively on market opportunities. Outside-in orientation maximizes customer value—and produces more supple organizations. Embracing an outside-in perspective—focusing on creatively delivering something of value to customers instead of obsessing over pushing your product portfolio—builds an inherent flexibility into organizations”.



A paradigm shift in management“Achieving continuous innovation and customer delight lies outside the performance envelope of firms that are built on hierarchical bureaucracy and focused on short-term gains and the stock price. It requires a fundamentally different way of leading and managing—in effect, a paradigm shift in management. It means:
  • a shift from controlling individuals to self-organizing teams;
  • a shift from coordinating work by hierarchical bureaucracy to dynamic linking;
  • a shift from a preoccupation with economic value to an embrace of values that will grow the firm; and
  • a shift from top-down communications to horizontal conversations”.

Full article here.


My thoughts:  A focus on Values beyond economic value alone, Trust & Policies: Trust-relationships with employees and simple, straight forward policies, that together encourage  self-organizing teams and horizontal conversations. The company as a Complex Adaptive system.