Essential Balances in Projects
These are part of the frames from the projects-flavour of the “Essential Balances” theme, delivered in a workshop format at a training event yesterday in Athens. Tweet This Post
Aggregated enterprise architecture wisdom
These are part of the frames from the projects-flavour of the “Essential Balances” theme, delivered in a workshop format at a training event yesterday in Athens. Tweet This Post
Increased automation is key to competitiveness in the digital economy. But automation requires articulating clear business rules and embedding them into systems. Once there, those business rules more or less run our businesses. They take or guide actions ranging from pricing products and services to ordering parts and supplies to defining partner relationships. Before companies […]
Being agile is to be able to move quickly and easily [1]. Being flexible is something else, it is the ability to be easily modified to respond to altered circumstances [2][3]. So if agility is about speed, flexibility is about adaptation. In a business solution [4] context, both are needed to respond effectively and efficiently […]
The Open Group Publishes First Global Reference Model for Natural Resources Industry. The EM Model establishes an operational blueprint for organizations that impacts the definition of business activities across the indus…
There are days when you just know you are right. It may not happen often, and certainly not with every topic, but it happens – and there is nothing more frustrating than knowing to the depths of your knowing-place that the path upon which others have…
There are days when you just know you are right. It may not happen often, and certainly not with every topic, but it happens – and there is nothing more frustrating than knowing to the depths of your knowing-place that the path upon which others have…
Do you sometimes feel like an Enterprise Archaeologist instead of Enterprise Architect? :-)Please indulge me as I talk IT for a second. Age old legacy systems, thousands of shadow applications, complex dependencies and inability to respond to changing …
Do you sometimes feel like an Enterprise Archaeologist instead of Enterprise Architect? :-)Please indulge me as I talk IT for a second. Age old legacy systems, thousands of shadow applications, complex dependencies and inability to respond to changing …

I caught up with a friend the other day and we were talking about how her work was going. She described a series of different situations where she felt dis-empowered and demoralised.
There were things she saw that needed to change. She knew how to change them, but when she started investigating, talking to people, trying to make things better she received the equivalent of..

This manifested itself in several ways:
– Ego – why are you doing this?
– Territory – This is my thing
– Cultural – That’s not how we do things
– Process Obsession – That doesn’t fit our process
– Poor Management – i’m not going to support you
My friend was trying to change the Status Quo and when she tried, the Status Quo in both visible and invisible ways caused her to pause and think of stopping.
As we were talking i posed the question. ‘What if you were to act as if these things didn’t exist?’
As we explored answers to this question the idea and phrase of an ‘Invisible Coup’ came into my head.
The obstacles placed in front of my friend by the status quo are caused by the entrenched, incumbent networks of power. Why not create your own, new networks of power?
Why not create an ‘Invisible Coup’? what would the features of it be?
I’d like to be able to write that after our conversation my colleague went on and achieved all the things she wanted to, that wouldn’t be true. Change isn’t really like that is it. She is however continuing to engage, continuing to push, continuing to gather support.
As for me, the Invisible Coup is a mental model i return to when i reflect on the dull thud of hitting an obstacle to the change i want to see.
Is the Invisible Coup a useful metaphor? what do you think?

The old analogy is of a graceful Swan seemingly effortlessly gliding through the water, whilst out of sight its submerged legs are kicking furiously in unseen effort.
The ‘Inverted Swan’ is the antithesis of the traditional analogy. The swans legs are out of the water flailing and flapping ineffectively in the air, whilst underneath the water, who knows? where is the grace in the work?
I see the inverted Swan more than i’d like to. Lots of industry with little value produced. Often caused by:
There should always be room for grace.
There should always be room to progress from merely viable to loveable.
When do you see the inverted swan?
How could we make sure we see it less?
Since it is hosted in IT, EA does not live to expectations about its role in managing complexity, change, business and operating models or enabling strategy at enterprise level. It fails.
While this book is not an architecture book, I’ve always maintained that architects need to be across the entire project delivery life cycle. So I think it’s relevant. I’ll start with the book’s shortcomings, but don’t let them put you off, as it does have something to offer. To be frank, the style is a […]