6 Conditions for Success

bg outline

Ben Geller, VP Marketing, Troux
 

At our recent customer conference we took a moment to share the common characteristics we see in our most successful customers.  Since this was so well received by the conference attendees we thought it would be a good idea to share with a wider audience.

describe the image

  1. Start with the end in mind.  Seek business value and outcomes that materially impact the top and bottom-line.  If delivering business value is not your top priority – it should be.  Delivering anything less ensures your effort will be regarded as not being relevant.  Ignore an approach that puts business value at it’s heart more than once and you can be sure your Enterprise Architecture (EA) program will be destine to sit on the shelf along with all of the enterprise models and charts that have been created.  Our most successful customers always tie their efforts back to answering key questions business stakeholders want to address.  Take a look at one of our recent blogs titled ‘Doing the Right Thing vs. Doing Things Right’ – for more details.   
  2. Gain the Right Level of Sponsorship.  Another common trait we see in our most successful customers is their ability to obtain executive management support for their Enterprise Portfolio Management (EPM)/ EA initiatives.  Executive sponsorship is absolutely crucial.  Organizational change management is one of the hardest things in business.  If you don’t have executive sponsorship, you just aren’t going to get the organization to change its behaviors. For an EPM/EA program to be successful, you need participation from people outside the EA program. The executive sponsor does not need to be an EA expert or even care about the discipline of EA. But he or she must care about the results.  To read more about this condition for success see our blog titled ‘How to avoid common mistakes with your EA program – Part I’.
  3. Start Small and Market Internally.  A common mistake many EPM/EA teams make is based on a ‘Boil the Ocean’ approach to information gathering.  Gathering and assessing data can be quite seductive. But if taken too far it’s the equivalent of modeling the universe, and it’s a recipe for disaster. In fact if we see any problem today in our deployments, it’s that people get so excited they want to gather all their data at once.  It is also important to market your success internally. You secured support from the organization by promising something good for them, so make sure you go back and tell them you did it.  Then the organization as a whole can share in your success.  Read more about these success criteria in our blog titled  ‘Just say no to modeling the universe’.
  4. Collaborate Rather Than Dictate.  In a recent Wall Street Journal (WSJ) blog1 Michael Krigsman stated, “Modern CIOs must reconcile the gap between their role as protector of corporate information assets and the need to drive organizational innovation and openness.   We all are quite aware that promoting collaboration inside a large organization doesn’t just happen; it requires a thoughtful plan, coordination, and effort.  Enterprise Portfolio Management can help CIOs change the unwanted behavior that often is manifested by information hoarding and create a culture of collaboration by giving CIOs the means to shift the conversation from technology to business strategy and innovation.  See our blog ‘Lessons Learn from Social Networking’ to read more about EPMs role in institutionalizing collaboration. 
  5. Seek Value Early and Often.  Instant gratification is something we all have grown accustom.  The same holds true for business.  Programs and projects that deliver their intended results in short order are often viewed as benchmarks for other efforts to come.  Delivering value early and often should become a key part of any EPM/EA project teams battle-cry.  Our most successful customers have been able to go from project start-up to delivering quantifiable business results in a few short weeks.  Take a look at the case study from Scottish Widows Investment Partnership – a 2012 InfoWorld/Forrester EA Award winner to see how they delivered results in just 12 weeks. 
  6. Institutionalize and Embed in Process.  We have found that the organizations that achieve “best in class” results from their EPM/EA efforts are those that recognize that it is lifestyle change, not a one-time “crash diet.  To make EPM/EA a lifestyle change rather than a crash diet, an organization must commit first to “instrumenting” the business to measure the performance and business value of key enterprise assets such as applications, technology, business capabilities, investments and information.  By tying EA/EPM to key processes and initiatives such as application portfolio management, cloud migration, mergers and acquisitions, to name a few, EA/EPM teams will ensure the lifestyle change they deliver will have positive impacts across the enterprise.  For more examples of how to embed EPM in key processes read our blog titled ’Application Portfolio Management: Crash Diet or Lifestyle Change’.

     

    New Call\u002Dto\u002DAction

    Categories Uncategorized

    Join us for The Open Group Conference in Sydney – April 15-18

    The Open Group is busy gearing up for the Sydney conference, which will take place on April 15-18, 2013. With over 2,000 Associate of Enterprise Architects (AEA) members in Australia, Sydney is an ideal setting for industry experts from around the world to gather and discuss the evolution of Enterprise Architecture and its role in transforming the enterprise. Be sure to register today! … Continue reading

    Case Experiences and Best practices Using ArchiMate® and TOGAF®

    <p>Implementing Enterprise Architecture in any organization requires an effective method and a consistent way of modeling to build architecture models. The Open Group standards <a title=”proven, comprehensive and generic methodology and framework” href=”http://www.bizzdesign.com/consultancy/enterprise-architecture-management/togaf/#The Open Group Architecture Framework”>TOGAF</a>® and <a title=”open modeling language for architects to model and communicate Enterprise Architecture” href=”http://www.bizzdesign.com/consultancy/enterprise-architecture-management/archimate/#Architects need a unified framework to describe enterprise architectures”>ArchiMate</a>®  are used worldwide to implement Enterprise Architecture. TOGAF® focuses on the method of implementing and maintaining Enterprise Architecture. ArchiMate® is an Enterprise Architecture modeling language standard. A lot of organizations in various markets worldwide use (a a combination of) these standards.</p><p>On <strong>28-March-2013</strong> I will present a webinar via <a title=”Leading the development of open, vendor-neutral IT standards and certifications” href=”http://www.opengroup.org”>The Open Group</a> in which I will give an overview of some real-life case experiences in using ArchiMate® and TOGAF® for implementing Enterprise Architecture. The approach, deliverables and examples of the several case studies will be shared. Furthermore, practical do’s and don’ts in adopting ArchiMate® and TOGAF® will be discussed. Attendees of this webinar will benefit from the lessons learned, and will learn which aspects are typically important to consider when implementing Enterprise Architecture in any organization.</p><p><a title=”Register for this webinar” href=”https://opengroupevents.webex.com/ec0606l/eventcenter/enroll/join.do?confViewID=1003593497&amp;theAction=detail&amp;confId=1003593497&amp;path=program_detail&amp;siteurl=opengroupevents”>Registration details</a> for this webinar can be found on the Open Group website.</p><p> </p><div class=”captionImage left” style=”width: 600px;”><img class=”left” src=”http://www.bizzdesign.com/assets/BlogDocuments-2/_resampled/resizedimage600255-Togaf-archimate-repository-reference-models.png” alt=”Togaf archimate repository reference models” title=”During the webinar Rob Kroese will explain TOGAF and archiMate” width=”600″ height=”255″/><p class=”caption”>ArchiMate® and TOGAF®</p></div>

    Categories Uncategorized

    Why Business Needs Platform 3.0

    The Internet gives businesses access to ever-larger markets, but it also brings more competition. To prosper, they must deliver outstanding products and services. Often, this means processing the ever-greater, and increasingly complex, data that the Internet makes available. The question they now face is, how to do this without spending all their time and effort on information technology. … Continue reading

    The Project Business Sprintlines

    This post is the fifth in a series of ten about real life experiences of using business model thinking as a foundation for planning and delivering change. Writing this post I’ve had the help of a true friend and admirable colleague (Eva Kammerfors) whom I’ve shared many of the referred to business model experiences with. […]

    Capabilities Demystified – Part 2

    Constructing Business Capabilities Business capabilities have quickly become the core element of most business architecture models. Their appeal is largely driven by three factors. First, business leaders at all levels find capabilities an appealing and useful way to think about growing their organization’s impact. Second, capabilities are versatile, easily applied to high level strategic activities […]

    Link Collection — March 24, 2013

    • LEAD Frameworks | LEAD Frameworks, Methods & Approaches

      Speaking of Enterprise Architecture frameworks, this just crossed my radar via Twitter. Just passing it along, not an endorsement as I haven’t had a chance to dig in.

      “LEAD is an abbreviation for “Layered Enterprise Architecture Development” and is often used as a synonym to describe the entire LEAD concept. The LEAD Frameworks refers to either the entire LEAD concept, or to a specific LEAD Framework. A certified LEAD practitioner is called a LEAD eXpert or a LEAD Architect.

      The LEAD version 3.0 currently consists of 10 frameworks, 6 methods and 4 approaches that are all integrated to each other with supporting maps, matrices and models that can be used for all aspects of enterprise modelling e.g. business model, competencies, value, services, processes, information, applications, data, platforms, infrastructure and cloud as well as for transformation and innovation modelling.”

      tags: enterprise_architecture entarch

    • #ogChat Summary – Business Architecture | The Open Group Blog

      I participated in this Business Architecture tweet jam. It was fun and interesting. No surprise, I have a different view than the rest. I’m @bmichelson in the linked post.
      “The Open Group hosted a tweet jam (#ogChat) to discuss the evolution of Business Architecture and its role in enterprise transformation. In case you missed the conversation, here is a recap of the event.”

      tags: business_architecture business_analysis #entarch #bizarch

    • Amazon launches “Send to Kindle” button for web publishers and WordPress blogs — paidContent

      I added this to elementallinks.com. Look for the “Send to Kindle” icon at the end of my posts. I tested on 3 devices: Kindle Touch, iphone and ipad, works well.
       
      “Amazon is now allowing publishers to add “Send to Kindle” buttons to their websites and WordPress blogs, the company announced on the Kindle blog Tuesday.”

      tags: kindle blogs

    • Taotwit’s Too-Big-To-Tweet: TOGAF Good or Bad? – Definitely Ugly!

      Nigel raises some great points on TOGAF and the challenges in applying EA frameworks in the real-world. Not to mention, a world where english is NOT the first language.

      “TOGAF just tries too hard and ends up failing on a few counts: it’s too comprehensive to be a usable framework and not specific enough to be a methodology.”

      However, Nigel also recognizes that TOGAF is currently the only credible option to get newbies up-to-speed.

      So, how do we change that?

      tags: entarch enterprise_architecture togaf

    • Big data in the age of the telegraph – McKinsey Quarterly – Organization – Strategic Organization

      Decision-making and authority placed nearest the real-time data, circa 1854.

      “Daniel McCallum created the first organization chart in response to the information problem hobbling one of the longest railroads in the world. In surprising contrast to today’s top-down organization pyramids, in McCallum’s chart the hierarchy was reversed: authority over day-to-day scheduling and operations went to the divisional superintendents down the line, who oversaw the five branch lines of the railroad. The reasoning: they possessed the best operating data, were closer to the action, and thus were best placed to manage the line’s persistent inefficiencies.”

      Plus, cool 1854 org charts… flow with data.

      tags: mckinsey data real-time active-information

    • The Arguments Your Company Needs – Michael Schrage – Harvard Business Review

      What is your company’s most important (current / ongoing) argument? Is it focused on strategy, value or individuals?

      “Asked several years ago to describe the most important argument taking place at Walmart, then-CEO Lee Scott immediately replied, “The size of our stores.” The world’s largest retailer was debating just how small its footprints and formats could be while still serving customer needs and its own brand equity promise. That conversation, Scott said, provoked a lot of new thinking and analysis.”

      ..”All firms have strategies and cultures. But sometimes the quickest and surest way to gain valuable insight into their fundamentals is by asking, “What’s the most important argument your organization is having right now?””

      tags: schrange hbr business_analysis

    Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

    Power, Process, Project, People – Force Two

    Recently I have started a series about Power, Process, Project and People. After I have touched Power, I now like to reflect a bit on Process and what I am doing with processes in my daily Enterprise Architecture work. Just to repeat the definition fro…

    A Comparison of the Top Four Enterprise-Architecture Methodologies

    I recently came across a very good article with above title written by Roger Sessions on the Microsoft Network. It is
    one of the few articles which is backed up by good amount of industry research,
    rich usage of references and very precise analysis of Enterprise Architecture
    literature.


    In this article Roger compares following four leading
    Enterprise Architecture Frameworks;

    1. The Zachman Framework for Enterprise
      Architecture
    2. The Open Group Architecture Framework
    3. Federal Enterprise Architecture
    4. Gartner Enterprise Architecture Framework
    He does so within the context of a fictional company that is facing
    some very nonfictional operations problems. These problems include:
    1. IT
      systems that have become unmanageably complex and increasingly costly to
      maintain.
    2. IT
      systems that are hindering the organization’s ability to respond to
      current, and future, market conditions in a timely and cost-effective
      manner.
    3. Mission-critical
      information that is consistently out-of-date and/or just plain wrong.
    4. A
      culture of distrust between the business and technology sides of the
      organization.
    Roger concludes that, “these methodologies are quite different
    from each other, both in goals and in approach. This is good news and bad. It
    is bad news, in that it increases the difficulty for many organizations in
    choosing one single enterprise-architectural methodology. How do you choose
    between methodologies that have so little in common? Choosing between Zachman
    and TOGAF, for example, is like choosing between spinach and hammers. But the
    good news is that these methodologies can be seen as complementing each other.
    For many organizations, the best choice is all of these methodologies, blended
    together in a way that works well within that organization’s constraints.”

    Though the whitepaper is probably
    getting a bit dated (Mar 2007) especially given the new releases from TOGAF 9.1
    and Zachman have advanced the EA field in leaps and bounds, it is nonetheless a
    very good piece of academic comparison grounded in some real life business
    situation.

    I have personally done similar compare
    and contrast analysis between various EA frameworks on this blog through posts
    such as, EA
    Frameworks in Complete Harmony
    , Zachman
    Complexity and Change
    , EA
    – Different Perspectives
    . These can be referenced as further reading on
    this topic.  

    Categories Uncategorized

    Implementing Organizational Structure and Focus

    When I joined the IT Department at the American University of Sharjah as the Director, I was presented with an organizational structure challenge.  I found out that I had 21 direct reports and that my department did not have a concept of operational management!  I had just come from being the Manager, Business Application Services […]

    The post Implementing Organizational Structure and Focus appeared first on Enterprise Architecture in Higher Education.