While I consider it vital for all infrastructure and software architects to know the 15 basic business processes, that I will cover in this blog in the coming month, there is one business process more important than the rest. This process is the Hire 2 Retirement or HR process. It is important for two reasons. … Continue reading The one business process that all architects need to know→
New technologies are changing the way we do business, changing the way we interact with things We are intertwining digital tools with everyday life and everyday business processes, creating a world of connected things and connected people. Organizations also are becoming more connected, forming stronger partnerships to deliver smarter value to customers and clients. It
When the office you put people in becomes the artwork
Is this what happens when you are free to move beyond profit?
1) Subsistance-> 2) Profit-> 3) Beyond Profit = Art
Maybe this is just the logical next step towards decadence, as over time the focus on value for organisations has shifted like so:
1) Value to customers -> 2) Value to business owner -> 3) Value to Shareholders -> 4) Decadence
As the point of focus moves further away from the point of real value creation to a place place of decadent abstraction, so the decisions that are made can become freer and artful.
it enables you to, for example, acquire a loss making organisation with a hockey stick growth curve but no plan for monetising user adoption and no hope of profit.
It enables you to forget about a return on an acquisition (Most of them degrade value anyway, so lets just stop pretending and buy).
I’m not saying this concept applies across the board, just as there are still subsistance farmers (and always will be), but it does appear to me that certain organisations in certain sectors have achieved a level of abstraction (from value creation) and therefore decadence to start to build business as Art.
Maybe this post doesn’t make any sense at all, How can business be art> how can it achieve decadence when every organisation has to go through the same (but maybe accelerated) growth phases?
Maybe its because, actually, depending upon the business model of the organisation, it doesn’t really matter what you do inside the organisation. The vague direction of triumph or plight is already set, like a behemoth supertanker, in a direction dictated by the business model and its market context at a point in time, the pilots of the supertanker are merely trying to steer it by flapping their arms.
In writing this post i’m not saying this is a positive or negative phenomenon, it just is. It also makes me wonder what sort of organisation a Silicon Valley dwelling Salvador Dali would have built?
Heres to the new surrealism, decadent capitalist art!
Just came across an interesting post by Colin Bannon, CTO BT this morning. The infographic which he has shared compares and contrasts the Old or a more traditional operating model of IT with a new, evolving operating model of IT. While I have…
Just came across an interesting post by Colin Bannon, CTO BT this morning. The infographic which he has shared compares and contrasts the Old or a more traditional operating model of IT with a new, evolving operating model of IT. While I have…
How successfully does your organization implement strategic business change initiatives? A recent study[1] by the Economist Intelligence Unit revealed that only 56 percent of strategic initiatives meet the original goals and business intent. Advances in digital technology will continue to enable all kinds of new products and services and inspire innovative strategies, but will your
This model is part of my toolbox for working with business architectures. The Inventory Model The important thing to remember is to be agile minded in use of tools like this. So, when I say extendable I mean that this is definitely not all things that could or should be in the inventory. Reconfigure it in […]
This model is part of my toolbox for working with business architectures. The Inventory Model The important thing to remember is to be agile minded in use of tools like this. So, when I say extendable I mean that this is definitely not all things that could or should be in the inventory. Reconfigure it in […]
A while back, I wrote the post Modelling Homogenous Landscapes in #ArchiMate (Classes and Instances), which was a first post on modelling detailed infrastructure landscapes. Assuming you’re with me that a modelling language is very useful for large complex situations, but doesn’t … Continue reading →
Throughout this blog series we talked about using ArchiMate, and approaches for setting up ArchiMate models. We first discussed a top-down, and then a bottom-up approach, and presented examples from our consulting practice for both. Now here i…
Process models are a powerful means to describe, analyze and communicate processes. However, process models are often outdated and underused. The reasons for this differ. Sometimes it seems that people are unable to read and understand models,…
In the previous postings we zoomed in on developing “top-down” or “enterprise” models, laced with many practical tips to help practitioners to get started. In this post we tackle the other end of the spectrum, and discuss how to get started with “Bottom-up” or “solution” models. We will zoom in on several aspects, including structuring your models, and linking to your enterprise models.