#eavoices
The Open Group Launches the IT4IT™ Management Guide
The Open Group, the vendor-neutral IT consortium, has announced the release of a new book to support its IT4IT Reference Architecture Standard at The Open Group San Francisco 2016. IT4IT™ for Managing the Business of IT – A Management Guide, … Continue reading →![]()
Transitioning to Customer-Driven Architectures: A Conversation with Trevor Cheung
By The Open Group Digitalization is driving massive changes across the IT landscape. To adapt to the changes brought about by new technologies, organizations are beginning to move away from traditional IT-centric architectures to new customer-driven ones. By aligning business … Continue reading →![]()
The hot handed architect
As architects we are usually prone not to work on similar problems all the time and we also often end up doing things outside of a close team structure. This makes us different to many people around us as most people in IT or in the business have a repetitive job or at least a … Continue reading The hot handed architect →
Oracle®, UNIX® and Innovation
By Darrin Johnson, Director, Solaris Kernel, Drivers & Conformance, Oracle Corporation Oracle was born from the idea of having a database with single source base (in C)(1) that could be used on multiple operating systems. With this philosophy, they brought … Continue reading →![]()
Slidedeck from IASA Business Architecture eSummit
A couple of days back I did an online session at IASA‘s eSummit on business-architecture. It seemed to go pretty well – I’ve had a few good comments about it since then, which is always a good sign. The theme…
The Enterprise Architect versus the Project Manager, cnt’d
continuing
The PM is as such the administrative secretary of a project team who has to facilitate the work of the professionals rather than tell them what to do and how they should break down the work. Hence, while the Project Manager has own role in a…
Solving the Polyglot Persistence Puzzle – Defining the Information Value Lifecycle
I believe an Information Architect’s primary purpose isto increase the value of the information assets belonging to anorganization. Securing and makinginformation available is no longer sufficient to grow the competitivecapabilities of an organization. Information architects must get:
- the right information
- to the right person
- at the right time
- in the right format
- so the best decisions can be made at all levels of theorganization.
To assist Information Architects in understanding anddefining a process to increase the value of information assets, I have createdan Information Value Lifecycle map. Thisis the first step in understanding the characteristics of information on theway to building Polyglot Persistent Architectures.
Building an Information Value Lifecycle map is done in 7steps.
Step 1 – Build the Information Value Lifecycle maplayout.
Each organization has multiple levels of decisionmaking. For each level of decisionmaking, there are Information Usage patterns and the Information Structuresneeded to support the usages. Theexample below starts with the Transaction Owners, the staff that create,maintain and own the transactions required to run the business. At the highest level are the CEO and Board ofDirectors (BoD). Maps will differ toreflect each organization’s hierarchical process of decision making.

Step 2 – Define the Information Usage patterns and theInformation Structures needed to support the Information Usage pattern.
Typically different levels of decision making requiredifferent levels of aggregation and summarization of information – from simpletransaction reporting to cross line of business and industry aggregations, analytics and predictive analysis. Information architectures over the years haveevolved well know sets of information structures (most commonly 3rdNormal Form, Star, Snowflake and Cube schemas) needed to support these UsagePatterns.

Step 3 – Define the processes needed to transform andaggregate information from transactions to the highest level of the decisionmaking process.
Extract, transform and load (ETL) processes moveinformation from one level of decision making to the next based on theinformation usage patterns. Mappingthese ETL process at a high level ensures data linage is understood andinformation accuracy is guaranteed. Someapplications provide capabilities that ‘jump’ the information past some levels tothe highest levels of the decision making process. Oracle Hyperion is an example.

Step 4 – Record Master Data Management usage patterns
Understanding Master Data usage patterns gives insightsinto which types of information are most important to an organization. They also indicate the level of informationmanagement maturity – more usage of master data reflects an understanding ofthe value of master data and a willingness to invest to realize that value.

Step 5 – Identify Big Data usage patterns
Most organizations have begun the process of deployingand realizing the value of Big Data. RecordingBig Data usage patterns shows the maturity of an organization in relationshipto their ability to adopt and deploy new technologies.

Step 6 – Identify the ‘Gold Nuggets’ in Big Data
Identify where Big Data data mining and analytics hasincreased the quality and/or quantity of information inputted into the InformationValue Lifecycle. These processes arecommonly referred to as finding the ‘Gold Nuggets’ of information that were previouslynot known. It’s important to understandthe value of the ‘Gold Nuggets’ in the decision making process of anorganization to justify the level of effort and expense of deploying Big Dataarchitectures.

Step 7 – Identify new Big Data information valueopportunities
The low cost of some Big Data architectures has allowedorganization to capture new sources of data that have lead to new ways of doingbusiness. Many of these use casesinclude social media as a way of judging the success of marketing campaigns andnew product lunches. Capturing these BigData opportunities shows the agility and innovativeness of an organization.

In the next blog I will introduce the 16 Information Characteristics that make up the heart of the Information Characteristics Architecture Method.
Solving the Polyglot Persistence Puzzle – Defining the Information Value Lifecycle
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4
I believe an Information Architect’s primary purpose is
to increase the value of the information assets belonging to an
organization. Securing and making
information available is no longer sufficient to grow the competitive
capabilities of an organization. Information architects must get:
- the right information
- to the right person
- at the right time
- in the right format
- so the best decisions can be made at all levels of the
organization.
To assist Information Architects in understanding and
defining a process to increase the value of information assets, I have created
an Information Value Lifecycle map. This
is the first step in understanding the characteristics of information on the
way to building Polyglot Persistent Architectures.
Building an Information Value Lifecycle map is done in 7
steps.
Step 1 – Build the Information Value Lifecycle map
layout.Each organization has multiple levels of decision
making. For each level of decision
making, there are Information Usage patterns and the Information Structures
needed to support the usages. The
example below starts with the Transaction Owners, the staff that create,
maintain and own the transactions required to run the business. At the highest level are the CEO and Board of
Directors (BoD). Maps will differ to
reflect each organization’s hierarchical process of decision making.

Step 2 – Define the Information Usage patterns and the
Information Structures needed to support the Information Usage pattern.
Typically different levels of decision making require
different levels of aggregation and summarization of information – from simple
transaction reporting to cross line of business and industry aggregations, analytics and predictive analysis. Information architectures over the years have
evolved well know sets of information structures (most commonly 3rd
Normal Form, Star, Snowflake and Cube schemas) needed to support these Usage
Patterns.

Step 3 – Define the processes needed to transform and
aggregate information from transactions to the highest level of the decision
making process.
Extract, transform and load (ETL) processes move
information from one level of decision making to the next based on the
information usage patterns. Mapping
these ETL process at a high level ensures data linage is understood and
information accuracy is guaranteed. Some
applications provide capabilities ‘jump’ the information past some levels to
the highest levels of the decision making process. Oracle Hyperion is an example.

Step 4 – Record Master Data Management usage patterns
Understanding Master Data usage patterns gives insights
into which types of information are most important to an organization. They also indicate the level of information
management maturity – more usage of master data reflects an understanding of
the value of master data and a willingness to invest to realize that value.

Step 5 – Identify Big Data usage patterns
Most organizations have begun the process of deploying
and realizing the value of Big Data. Recording
Big Data usage patterns shows the maturity of an organization in relationship
to their ability to adopt and deploy new technologies.

Step 6 – Identify the ‘Gold Nuggets’ in Big Data
Identify where Big Data data mining and analytics has
increased the quality and/or quantity of information inputted into the Information
Value Lifecycle. These processes are
commonly referred to as finding the ‘Gold Nuggets’ of information that were previously
not known. It’s important to understand
the value of the ‘Gold Nuggets’ in the decision making process of an
organization to justify the level of effort and expense of deploying Big Data
architectures.

Step 7 – Identify new Big Data information value
opportunities
The low cost of some Big Data architectures has allowed
organization to capture new sources of data that have lead to new ways of doing
business. Many of these use cases
include social media as a way of judging the success of marketing campaigns and
new product lunches. Capturing these Big
Data opportunities shows the agility and innovativeness of an organization.

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}
Digital-transformation – it’s about (much) more than just digital
Digital-transformation? We’ve been here before. And if we’re not careful about it, as enterprise-architects and others, we risk making an even worse hash of it than we did on those previous times. Oops… But what is ‘digital transformation’? There are…
The role of the Enterprise Architect versus the Project Manager
…without an EA, a transformation is blind. It does not see the objects around and in its path. Thus it bumps into them or it fails to consider them.
A decadesworth of consumer technology.
1991 i did not keep a television for the twelve years i spent living alone, preferring books and music to the ghastly and limited broadcast offerings of the 1990s. 2003 When we first started living together, my wife-to-be produced her elderly SONY Trinitron television, a cubic-metre of black plastic shrouding a buzzy, hot, squealing cathode-ray […]![]()