
The old analogy is of a graceful Swan seemingly effortlessly gliding through the water, whilst out of sight its submerged legs are kicking furiously in unseen effort.
The ‘Inverted Swan’ is the antithesis of the traditional analogy. The swans legs are out of the water flailing and flapping ineffectively in the air, whilst underneath the water, who knows? where is the grace in the work?
I see the inverted Swan more than i’d like to. Lots of industry with little value produced. Often caused by:
- Prizing effort instead of effectiveness
- The need to be seen to be doing something, when inaction may be the perfect action
- Personal enjoyment of the peculiar and personal joy of submersion in ‘flow’ to the exclusion of asking why?
- ‘Leaders’ cultivating an environment of ‘activity anxiety’, primarily to reinforce their own ego.
There should always be room for grace.
There should always be room to progress from merely viable to loveable.
When do you see the inverted swan?
How could we make sure we see it less?