Enterprise Architecture Lecture Series

Imagine you wanted to run a lecture series or course on Enterprise Architecture. Let’s say you ended up with 6 themes, such as:

The Alignment Trap
The EA Profession and the Discipline
The Value of Enterprise Architecture
Architecting Work Practice
Living Enterprise and Metropolis
Publishing and […]

The Enterprise Architecture entry in Wikipedia (i)

 Here is a hearty LinkedIn debate about the Enterprise Architecture entry in Wikipedia. I’ll comment only the outcome, the Wikipedia entry itself.  It is informative indeed, but how useful is it in practice to you? Ultimately, I found it…

Categories Uncategorized

Link Collection — February 5, 2012

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Under the pavement

@pbmobi asserts that “Infrastructure Architecture is the foundation for #entarch, not the other way round”. This suggestion draws on a book review of “The Works: Anatomy of a City”, in which the reviewer suggests that the tubes, wires and pipes und…

Under the pavement

@pbmobi asserts that “Infrastructure Architecture is the foundation for #entarch, not the other way round”. This suggestion draws on a book review of “The Works: Anatomy of a City”, in which the reviewer suggests that the tubes, wires and pipes und…

Data-architecture 101 and the naming-problem

The echoes of the ‘naming-problem‘ around business-architecture and the like continue to rumble on, this time via another happy Twitter-exchange with Ron Tolido: rtolido: @tetradian just show me the non-IT people that invented #entarch and / or #bizarch tetradian: @rtolido we’re in a circular-definition here: what you call #entarch or #bizarch is whatever was ‘invented’ […]

Competence, non-competence and incompetence

One of the key reasons why I’m so vehemently against any-centrism and suchlike revolves around the question of competence – or, more usually, the lack of it. Competence is where someone knows what they’re doing, and does it. And, oddly, often don’t bother to say that they’re competent – perhaps because they don’t need to […]

Configuring the EA approach

I often don’t like when EA discussions take the route into meta concepts. Enterprise architects – as the abstract thinkers they often are – have a tendency to discuss meta concepts. “What does the meta model of that method look like?”, “What do you mean when you say capability?”, “How do you define enterprise architecture?”. […]

IT-centrism, business-centrism and business-architecture

This one continues the recent theme of IT-centrism and why it’s such a problem for enterprise-architecture, but extends it into a slightly different direction, courtesy of a Tweet yesterday by Ron Tolido: rtolido: interesting stuff coming soon around a global Business Architect certification standard by The Open Group #ogsfo Important to say here that I […]

Active Info: Software Architect lessons, Data-driven problem solving

My latest posts on Active Information. It’d be fair to say I’m more focused on raising ideas than hit counts.

Software Architect Lessons from Amazon’s DynamoDB

I took a bit of a tangent (shocking!) on the DynamoDB announcement, pulling lessons from Werner Vogels’ recounting of the DynamoDB genesis that every software architect should embrace.

More data, more collaboration, more power.

In another showing of me being me, I ferret out a counter intuitive idea on the human change of data-driven decision-making.

The official excerpt:

“When you think about the human resistance in adopting data-driven decision-making, or really any change, at the root is the me question. What is the impact on my job, my span of control, my future opportunities?”