Serious coding with LLMs. Lab notes 2026-11-03: If you offload your thinking, you’re onboarding risks
The 8th ‘lab note’ on serious coding with LLMs. Observations on mental load and code quality risks.
Aggregated enterprise architecture wisdom
The 8th ‘lab note’ on serious coding with LLMs. Observations on mental load and code quality risks.
The seventh ‘lab note’. Watch a teaser video of what my serious LLM-coded application is capable of.
The sixth ‘lab note’. I had the code audited. With some helpful scripts and an example from my ‘context harness’
The fifth ‘lab note’. This time on ‘tokens’ and the cost of generating them when working with LLM coding. Throttling is happening. Prepare.
The fourth ‘lab note’. More on the power and Achilles’ heel of “brute force trial and error with token pattern statistics” Goodbye, Codex. Hello, Limits.
The third ‘lab note’. More on the power and Achilles’ heel of “brute force trial and error with token pattern statistics”
The second ‘lab note’. More on the power and Achilles’ heel of “brute force trial and error with token pattern statistics”
Before publishing about my very serious LLM-coding experiment, I am publishing a few shorter ‘lab notes’. This is the first one.
Coding with LLMs (Claude Code, OpenAI Codex) is often presented as the ‘killer app’ for Generative AI. But looking at data, it seems the one piece of the puzzle missing is actual cost. A quest into getting a less muddy picture about what is going on, w…
It turns out that AI has created a whole new language. Humans do not speak it, and they may even mistake it for talk about sex. But luckily Generative AI is able to translate it to something humans can understand (and where the sex doesn’t show up).
GPT-3o has done very well on the ARC-AGI-PUB benchmark. Sam Altman has also claimed OpenAI is confident that it can build Artificial General Intelligent (AGI). But that may be based on confusions around ‘learning’. On the difference between narrow, ge…
Google has announced ‘Willow’, a quantum computer that can calculate so fast it would take a supercomputer 10 septillion (a 10 with 25 zeros) years to do the same. But while the science is real and cool, the message is misleading. An explainer for non-…