The Next Power Pairing: CIO and HRO

Guest post by Amaresh Tripathy and Zack Capozzi Many CIOs haven’t given much thought to the human resources department, but maybe they should. Here’s why: Talent management deficits are derailing CEO plans. In the PwC 2012 global CEO survey, one in four CEOs said, because of talent challenges, they couldn’t pursue a market opportunity or had to cancel or delay a strategic initiative. Moreover, one in three CEOs is concerned that skill shortages will impact […]

EA Professional Oath

The Center for the Advancement of the Enterprise Architecture Profession (CAEAP) has created something that on first sight seems like a very good idea: the Enterprise Architect Professional Oath. The oath itself is one of eight what they call “pillars” of the profession, though from the website it is not yet entirely clear what the […]

Het bericht EA Professional Oath verscheen eerst op Rob Vens.

Different Words Meant Different Things, Part 3

This is the final installment of a three-part series that discusses how our vocabulary affects the way we conceptualize Enterprise Architecture, Business Architecture and their relationship. To close, The Open Group’s Leonard Fehskens will consider the implications of a more inclusive concept of enterprise on the future of Enterprise Architecture. Continue reading →

Different Words Mean Different Things, Part 2

This is a three-part series that discusses how our vocabulary affects the way we conceptualize Enterprise Architecture, Business Architecture and their relationship. This second installment will examine the effect of our definition of enterprise on how we think about EA. Continue reading →

Showrooming in the Knowledge Economy

In the knowledge economy, service providers often give away selected portions of their intellectual property, in the form of webinars, white papers, blogposts, free downloads or whatever. They then hope to generate revenue from other products and servi…

Basic is Best

Fellow foodies will recognize the recent movement towards “farm-to-table” restaurants. These venues attempt to simplify their menus and source ingredients as close to the source as possible. I had the opportunity to dine at such a restaurant the other evening. I was gushing about the appetizer to my server when she described the preparation for the item and then punctuated her comments with “basic is best”. I reminded my fellow enterprise architect diners there was an architecture lesson in that statement. They rolled their eyes and chuckled. But they also knew I was right.

I’m reminded of Frederick Brooks’ book The Mythical Man Month and his latest The Design of Design. The former must read book talks about complexity. But he refrains from damning all complexity. The world we live in and enterprises we strive to transform with enterprise architecture are complicated organisms, much like the human body. But sometimes a simple solution is the best approach. Fewer applications (think: portfolio rationalization). Fewer components. Fewer lines of code. Whatever level of abstraction you are working at, less is more.

I’m reminded of the enterprise architecture principle “Control Technical Diversity”. At one firm I created pithy catch phrases for each principles. I named this one “Less is More”. But perhaps another variation is what my server said the other night, “Basic is Best”.

Basic is Best

Fellow foodies will recognize the recent movement towards “farm-to-table” restaurants. These venues attempt to simplify their menus and source ingredients as close to the source as possible. I had the opportunity to dine at such a restaurant the other evening. I was gushing about the appetizer to my server when she described the preparation for the item and then punctuated her comments with “basic is best”. I reminded my fellow enterprise architect diners there was an architecture lesson in that statement. They rolled their eyes and chuckled. But they also knew I was right.

I’m reminded of Frederick Brooks’ book The Mythical Man Month and his latest The Design of Design. The former must read book talks about complexity. But he refrains from damning all complexity. The world we live in and enterprises we strive to transform with enterprise architecture are complicated organisms, much like the human body. But sometimes a simple solution is the best approach. Fewer applications (think: portfolio rationalization). Fewer components. Fewer lines of code. Whatever level of abstraction you are working at, less is more.

I’m reminded of the enterprise architecture principle “Control Technical Diversity”. At one firm I created pithy catch phrases for each principles. I named this one “Less is More”. But perhaps another variation is what my server said the other night, “Basic is Best”.

Should Shouldn’t Matter

An overly large focus on the way things “should be” is one of the biggest inhibitors to innovation and productive action. A focus on what should be rather than what can be inhibits new ideas and siphons off a tremendous amount of energy. Though this is a problem throughout most organizations, it seems to be […]

How to Measure a CIO’s Effectiveness

I was reading an interesting article about Issa’s move to refine and refresh the role of the CIO in the Federal sector.  It got me thinking about where we stand with the Clinger Cohen Act and how CIOs really should be measured for effectiveness. The Clinger Cohen Act is a functional description of what CIOs should be doing.  It says do X, Y, and Z.  It speaks very little to […]

Doing the Right Thing vs. Doing Things Right

bg outline

By: Ben Geller, VP Marketing, Troux

“Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things.”1 Businesses have always had tremendous decision-making challenges due to lack of relevant, complete, accurate, and timely information.  And this problem has become more acute as businesses expand or down-size, the pace of change increases, and the breadth of change expands.

So with all of this change and chaos swirling about, it’s not difficult to understand why some
business leaders get caught in the trap of spending precious human resources, time, and money on doing a lot of things right.  After all, what harm can come about from being efficient?  Efficiency equates to a smooth-running organization.  Efficiency means optimal performance.  Efficiency illustrates competency and expertise.  Certainly all of these attributes represent qualities we expect business leaders to establish within their enterprise.

blog pic 12412 2

But is this enough? 

If executives are fully occupied with execution and doing things right (e.g. processes, projects and production) how will they know when time, effort, and money are being spent on areas that are not truly important to the business.

While efficiency, doing things right, is certainly vital for business success, perhaps it’s even more important for executives to take a step back on a routine basis and ask themselves a few important questions such as:

  • Where are all business assets (people, processes, technology, applications)?
  • How much does all this cost?
  • Are all of these assets vital to my business – are there areas of obsolescence, redundancy or waste?
  • What assets are really needed to operate and grow the business?
  • What are our plans to introduce assets that are missing, optimize critical assets, and safely decommission the rest?

Answering these questions will help ensure precious resources (time, people and money) are being directed towards areas that will help the business grow and better compete. 

By adopting an Enterprise Portfolio Management (EPM) approach, leaders can make more informed business and technology strategy decisions by gaining insights into the key areas (portfolios) that characterize their business.  This transparency delivers executives with a clear, real-time view into their assets (tangible and non-tangible) and illustrates how and where they are spread across their business.  An EPM approach shows decision makers how assets support corporate goals, strategies, and core business processes.  With this newfound clarity, decision makers have the ability to better understand which assets are required to operate and grow their business and which are not.  This level of visibility equips business leaders with the ability to take action by making well-informed investment and divestment decisions.  Hence ‘Doing The Right Thing’. 

It is equally important to recognize that doing the right thing also means avoiding ‘doing the wrong thing’.  Unfortunately, it is not at all uncommon to hear examples of two project teams whose actions are in direct conflict with each other.  Imagine the savings and benefits in time, money and morale that would be achieved by eliminating one unneeded project.  

Using an EPM approach business leaders and decision makers no longer have to assume they are doing the right thing.  Decisions that affect the business can now be consistently made on facts rather that ‘gut-feel’.  Business leaders will be armed with the confidence that the time, money and effort, they are responsible for governing, are being spent in the right places.  Once executives know the right things to do, they can focus on doing them right.

1 Peter F. Drucker, Essential Drucker: Management, the Individual and Society
 


New Call\u002Dto\u002DAction


Categories Uncategorized