A kind of manifesto (short version)

Enterprise-architecture is dead; long live the architecture of the enterprise? Or something like that, anyway… Time for a kind of manifesto, I guess? As is perhaps too usual in my writing, the full-length version of the ‘manifesto’ ended up, uh, kinda long…

A kind of manifesto

Enterprise-architecture is dead; long live the architecture of the enterprise? Or something like that, anyway… So, what next? Time for a kind of manifesto, I guess? At the least, time for a fairly major paradigm-change in how we view the

EA Worst Practice Alert – "I do not need to make any special effort to communicate my value, my work speaks for itself!"

Many enterprise architects are modest (otherwise a great quality!) and feel awkward when they have to toot their own horn, the “value horn”, if you will…Shouldn’t our work speak for itself? What value is there in being pompous and blowing our own hor…

EA Worst Practice Alert – "I do not need to make any special effort to communicate my value, my work speaks for itself!"

Many enterprise architects are modest (otherwise a great quality!) and feel awkward when they have to toot their own horn, the “value horn”, if you will…Shouldn’t our work speak for itself? What value is there in being pompous and blowing our own hor…

Zachman Ontology, not Framework?

Time to rename it?There is an interesting discussion on the Zachman Framework LinkedIn group, about the practical use and tool support for the Zachman Framework. I’ve put up a couple of comments because the Zachman Framework is not a good basis for a practical EA use or tool support, and it is about time that…

Related posts:

  1. The Gill Framework: Do We Need Another EA Framework? We already have too many predefined frameworks for enterprise architecture,…
  2. Zachman Version 3.0 John Zachman recently announced a new version of his framework….
  3. Architecture Frameworks – too complex and multi-dimensional? Following the recent The Open Group’s “Business Transformation in Finance,…