Understanding the Importance of Identity
The first of a series of five “Identity Key Concepts” videos by the Jericho Forum. Continue reading →
The Journey from Visibility to Governance to Standardization to Reuse
Firms need to have a single picture to guide their efforts, to build a “foundation for execution” as described in Enterprise Architecture as Strategy[1]. It is not enough to have a single picture of the vision, mission and strategies of the firm. Firms will need to decide what business processes need to be standardized and what data need to be integrated. There is no right answer, but not having a common picture will mean that different parts of the firm will be building to their own visions.
However, I noticed through my interviews with CIOs that not many companies had this single picture. In fact, on probing further, some of them were not able to provide a high-level, organization-wide view of their organizations’ processes. As such, I postulated that organizations must mature through two stages before they can get to the standardization (and integration) stage.
 |
| Even star war troopers need mirrors! photo credit: Kalexanderson |
Firstly, they need to firstly establish an organization-wide, regularly updated view of the current situation in their organizations. This is akin to individuals looking into the mirror to decide what to change about their appearances. Similarly, organizations need visibility into their current state before they can decide what to standardize and what to leave alone. This is not a trivial exercise, especially in large organizations. Creating a current view from scratch can take months; keeping the view updated as the organization changes is an even bigger challenge.
 |
| Can you tell if something is out of line? photo credit: chekobero |
Second, organizations also need to have strong governance processes in place, so that changes to existing processes and data are channeled through a common approval body. How can any organization standardize unless all changes and new initiatives are checked against standardization requirements? In many of the organizations I studied that had mature EA practices, the organizations had strong governance in place. The Enterprise Architecture team was involved in approving new business initiatives, to ensure that the initiatives are not deviating from the organization’s standardization and integration vision. Without such a governance framework in place, standardization is just talk that has no teeth to be realized. It is possible for organizations to have strong governance first before having visibility. However, as mentioned above, organizations will need to establish visibility before they can move into the standardization stage.
Re-use seems to be a long way off for many organizations. Or is it? Maybe a iterative approach with fast and short iterations will work? I will be keen to hear from your experience of standardization and reuse.
[1] Enterprise Architecture as Strategy by Jeanne W. Ross, Peter Weill and David C. Robertson
The Journey from Visibility to Governance to Standardization to Reuse
Firms need to have a single picture to guide their efforts, to build a “foundation for execution” as described in Enterprise Architecture as Strategy[1]. It is not enough to have a single picture of the vision, mission and strategies of the firm. Firms will need to decide what business processes need to be standardized and what data need to be integrated. There is no right answer, but not having a common picture will mean that different parts of the firm will be building to their own visions.
However, I noticed through my interviews with CIOs that not many companies had this single picture. In fact, on probing further, some of them were not able to provide a high-level, organization-wide view of their organizations’ processes. As such, I postulated that organizations must mature through two stages before they can get to the standardization (and integration) stage.
|
| Even star war troopers need mirrors! photo credit: Kalexanderson |
Firstly, they need to firstly establish an organization-wide, regularly updated view of the current situation in their organizations. This is akin to individuals looking into the mirror to decide what to change about their appearances. Similarly, organizations need visibility into their current state before they can decide what to standardize and what to leave alone. This is not a trivial exercise, especially in large organizations. Creating a current view from scratch can take months; keeping the view updated as the organization changes is an even bigger challenge.
|
| Can you tell if something is out of line? photo credit: chekobero |
Second, organizations also need to have strong governance processes in place, so that changes to existing processes and data are channeled through a common approval body. How can any organization standardize unless all changes and new initiatives are checked against standardization requirements? In many of the organizations I studied that had mature EA practices, the organizations had strong governance in place. The Enterprise Architecture team was involved in approving new business initiatives, to ensure that the initiatives are not deviating from the organization’s standardization and integration vision. Without such a governance framework in place, standardization is just talk that has no teeth to be realized. It is possible for organizations to have strong governance first before having visibility. However, as mentioned above, organizations will need to establish visibility before they can move into the standardization stage.
Re-use seems to be a long way off for many organizations. Or is it? Maybe a iterative approach with fast and short iterations will work? I will be keen to hear from your experience of standardization and reuse.
[1] Enterprise Architecture as Strategy by Jeanne W. Ross, Peter Weill and David C. Robertson
Higher Ed CIO Challenges 3 – Cloud Computing Services
The third Higher Education CIO challenge focuses on cloud computing services. These offerings allow higher education CIOs to radically re-think their enterprise architectures. “In the 2011 CIO agenda, 64% of higher education CIOs expected to move m…
Management Information for Managing Innovation
Management information is not particular difficult to produce, it is difficult to make use of. Management information can be produced in quite a few ways and supported by quite a few methods, but too much management information will eventually clutter the line of sight of the decision makers and as such work against holistic management. […]
Should the CIO Ban Email?
I was at a conference last week where I heard about a CIO who is banning email. Looks like we’re not finished having a conversation about how email is hampering employee productivity. What tools and techniques can CIOs employ to improve enterprise communications in the face of a proliferation of channels? Is trading email for social collaboration tools the answer or do we need to change employee behavior? How about using the right tools at […]
If you liked this, you might also like:
Framework versus body-of-knowledge
What’s the difference between a framework and a body-of-knowledge? A colleague asked me to write some notes on this, and it seems worthwhile doing so in more generally-available form – in other words, a blog-post. To me this is much…
THE FIVE “Vs” OF LEADERSHIP
There are lots of models around describing leadership characteristics and roles. Here is one I have been using for a number of years to introduce the role of the leader. While not a complete model, it does get across some of the more important attributes of excellent leaders. VISION – One of the first roles […]
I don’t know what it is about simple geometric shapes but…
I don’t know what it is about simple geometric shapes but i keep using them to try to simply explain situations, opportunities and concepts to stakeholders (and more importantly, to myself). Here is a new one
IT Jobs – Misplaced Value?
This morning I was discussing an article from CIO.com by Patrick Thibodeau with my colleague Jack Santos. The article “IT Job Seekers Face Hot Yet Terrible Market” discusses how the IT job market is both hot and not, mentions effects from expectation inflation, and that it depends on location, location, location. The article sites a […]
The post IT Jobs – Misplaced Value? appeared first on Mike Rollings.
IT Jobs – Misplaced Value?
This morning I was discussing an article from CIO.com by Patrick Thibodeau with my colleague Jack Santos. The article “IT Job Seekers Face Hot Yet Terrible Market” discusses how the IT job market is both hot and not, mentions effects from expectation inflation, and that it depends on location, location, location. The article sites a […]
Rules, principles, belief and faith
Following on from the previous post ‘Rules, principles and the Inverse-Einstein Test‘, there’s an important corollary about real-time sensemaking and and decision-making – it was in my notes for the post, but I forgot to include it, so I’ll do…